formulated fungi B. bassiana and M. anisopliae at the concentrations of 0.12 x 10 6conidia /g, 0.22 x 10 6 conidia /g, 0.32 x 10 6 conidia / g, and 0.42 x 10 6 conidia /g. M. anisopliae was more effective against tested insects than B. bassiana. Four concentrations of B. bassiana were tested against R. dominica, S. oryzae and O. surinamensis. LC50 were 1.2 x 10 5 conidia / g, 1.6 x 10 5 conidia / g and 1.4 x 10 5conidia / g, respectively. The same concentrations M. anisopliae were tested against R. dominica, S. oryzae and O. surinamensis. LC50 were 2.7 x 10 5 conidia / g, 1.3 x 10 5 conidia / g, and 3.5 x 10 5 conidia / g, respectively." />
Entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) As biological control agents on some stored product insects
Abdel-Raheem MA, IA Ismail, RS Abdel Rahman, NA Farag, IE Abdel Rhman
The present work was evaluation of the efficacy of the entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae on Rhyzopertha dominica, Sitophilus oryzae and Oryzaephilus surinamensis. Each insect species lass="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">formulated fungi B.bassiana and M. anisopliae at the concentrations of 0.12 x 10 6conidia /g, 0.22 x 10 6 conidia /g, 0.32 x 10 6 conidia / g, and 0.42 x 10 6 conidia /g. M. anisopliae was more effective against tested insectsthan B. bassiana. Four concentrations of B. bassiana were tested against R. dominica, S. oryzae and O. surinamensis. LC50 were 1.2 x 10 5 conidia / g, 1.6 x 10 5 conidia / gand 1.4 x 10 5conidia / g, respectively. The same concentrations M. anisopliae were tested against R. dominica,S. oryzae and O. surinamensis. LC50 were 2.7 x 10 5 conidia / g, 1.3 x 10 5 conidia / g, and 3.5 x 10 5 conidia / g, respectively.
Abdel-Raheem MA, IA Ismail, RS Abdel Rahman, NA Farag, IE Abdel Rhman. Entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) As biological control agents on some stored product insects. J Entomol Zool Stud 2015;3(6):316-320.