author(s)
Dr. Md. Abdul Ahad

abstract
The objectives of this article are to prove that any kind of evolution is not possible by Darwin’s theory (current version) i.e. this theory unfits to disturb the Hardy-Weinberg’s Law and modify Mendel’s Laws. In other words, Hardy-Weinberg’s Law and Mendel’s Laws never support any kind of evolution. However, Darwin’s theory (current version) is popularly known as Neo-Darwinism/ the new synthesis/ the synthetic theory/the evolutionary synthesis/the modern synthesis/ population genetics/evolutionary genetics and gene mutation is the main agent of it, which plays the key role of Neo-Darwinism. But all mutations arise by the errors of DNA replication and damage of DNA. Consequently, it is harmful for all living organisms; hence about 3,500 diseases (including cancer) are found in humans by a single gene mutation. Therefore, mutated organisms are least fitted for survival and reproduction, and thus gene mutation unfits for any kind of evolution. As gene mutation is responsible for the origin of humans (physical anthropology) from the chimpanzee; so, humans were not evolve from the chimpanzees. If chimpanzees were evolved into a human, then no chimpanzees could be found in the world. Similarly, since, evolution is a continuous process, at present, it is occurring rapidly; mutations are constantly occurring in plants and animals. Consequently, all other organisms have to transfer into another organism successively and present organisms have to be absent from the earth but not so happen. However, other agents of Neo-Darwinism are interrelated to mutation and depend on mutations for their actions on the evolution. Thus, those agents of Neo-Darwinism are also unfit for the evolution of new species. Again, it is proved separately and repeatedly that other agents of Neo-Darwinism are also unfit for any kind of evolution. So, albino and double-headed animals are very common in nature, which arise by mutations, yet an albino or double-headed animal variety/race is developed either naturally or artificially. However, if a new type arises accidentally by the agent of Neo-Darwinism; but by random mating, it returns to the original type, and by non-random mating, it produced homozygous organisms and may extinct over time. Hence, there is no evidence that a species evolved either artificially or naturally. Hence, no evolution occurs by Neo-Darwinism. So, fossil evidence opposes Neo-Darwinism, and many evolutionary biologists also reject this theory, which supports the results of the present study. Thus, Neo-Darwinism/population genetics (evolutionary genetics) is opposite to any kind of evolution and those never disturb the Hardy-Weinberg’s Law and could not modify Mendel’s Laws. So, Darwinists oppose the Neo-Darwinism.